In order to give clear differences among the three positions of ethical judgments, it is important to an action. Virtue Theories This category of ethical theories is also referred to as the ethics of Utilitarian.
Consequentialist Theories This category of ethical theories gives strong emphasis on the consequences of a specific course of action. The aim of the ethical theories under deontological category tend to force people abide by absolute principles irrespective of human consequences of a specific action Ellis These general principles of ethics may be classified as rules of ethics for various research works.
Contrast The positions of the three categories of ethical theories provide different emphasis on aspects of their ethical choices Ivanhoe et al. The two ethical theories tend to raise the question of whether ethical principles exist.
The two categories of ethical theories tend to contradict the view that there is a need to have internal principles, which provide judgment with absolutism Miller The ethical judgment position in this category emphasizes on the need to assess the sensitivity within the context of the action Miller This is an ethical judgment position based on the action but not its consequences.
He proceeds to explain that we should act as if maxim of our actions was to be the universal law of nature by our will. One major disadvantage of these principles is that their international positions can result into moral dictatorship. The existence in various ethical positions about the same action normally results into different judgments Miller The extreme position of this ethical theory justifies the fact that the end justifies the means.
The end purpose of the ethics of consequences is the greatest advantage of the theory. Conclusion The three ethical theories provide three different basic grounds under which we make judgment of an action.
From the position, one can argue that the society can form principles guiding our judgments on actions based on their outcomes. On the other hand, position based on Consequentialist theory will justify the deception of the researcher if it would research into positive consequences in terms of knowledge and better situations of the community.
These ethical judgmental positions about an action are broadly categorized under three main ethical theories. When a problem occurs within an organization or a community, people may give different ethical opinions depending on their personal views. According to the ethics of consequences, it is the effects of an action, which determines its ethical worthiness.
Deontological theories This category of ethical theories is also referred to as the ethics of principles. The aim of this paper is to discuss and compare the three theories in terms of their judgmental applications to actions.
If the deception is perceived by the community to be ethical, then his action is justified. It is because a principled position will support the need for honesty as the absolute principle. Our Guarantees Write a paper evaluating three ethical theories.
For instance, a researcher may decide to cheat the community of his research context in order to achieve his objectives and maintain the positive perception of the community about his work Miller The two categories of ethical theories tend to raise the question of whether principle ethics depend upon values of a given community.
Otherwise, the action will be immoral.
Within this ethical category of reference, an individual or an institution gives judgment on a specific action based on the possible effects of the action Miller When the society perceives the results of a particular action to immoral, then the action itself will be unethical.
Certain issues lead to different positions of each theory. For example, honesty, respect, and justice are among actions that abide by moral principles. Ethics of principles provides an argument that only actions, which abide by ethical principles, are moral actions.
People who conduct research works that involve human subjects are needed to follow regular procedures in order to obtain essential ethical approval.Explain the key features of one recognised ethical framework for counselling and Compare and contrast these models with the main model Chosen.!
Assignment exemplar 3! Personal development statement LEVEL 3 ASSIGNMENT INDEX • mi-centre.com 1.
Title: Level 3 Assignment Index Created Date. Professional Ethics: Compare And Contrast. Print Reference this. Disclaimer: Another version of the egoist, the enlightened egoist, is able to look further along in time, they are also able to think about other peoples interests when making ethical decisions.
An example of an enlightened egoist would be some one that helps a turtle. Compare And Contrast One Ethical Framework With Another In Couselling Ethical Framework Fall Creating and defining my own ethical framework is essential in future success as a businessman, a leader, and a team player.
Code of Ethics Compare & Contrast This paper points out the most common ethical codes which are practiced by each of the three establishments while on the same hand showing how vastly different they are.
If one were to compare these aspects with the title of the piece, one could come to the conclusion that the artist sees women who work. Ethical Framework Fall Creating and defining my own ethical framework is essential in future success as a businessman, and though the author for one dislikes ethical dilemmas, the learning environment.
I play the role of the counsellor, and another student plays the role of the client. In order for me to answer the learning. Compare and contrast Ethics, Morals and Values Compare and contrast Ethics, Morals and Values Students name Institution Ethics, Morals and.
Find Study Resources.
Main Menu; by School; by Subject; by Book. They vary from one community to another and therefore not universal%(20).Download