Comparison of contemporary and traditional structure

Differences Between the Traditional Organizational Structure & One That Is Team-Based?

Flexibility The contemporary organization achieves the empowerment of working-level employees by introducing horizontal elements into the organizational structure.

The company might hire a manufacturer to assemble products, an accounting firm to manage finances and a shipping company to distribute orders. Companies can achieve some flexibility within the traditional organizational structure, but the managers and executives make their decisions at a distance from where the work is being carried out.

Traditional Vs. Contemporary Organizational Structure

Traditionally, companies kept such work in-house, creating functional departments such as accounting and manufacturing, along with the management hierarchy needed to oversee operations.

The virtual structure can change its supply network according to its needs.

A contemporary structure empowers working-level employees, reduces centralized control and holds all organizational levels responsible for their own decisions. Performance Evaluation Traditionally, managers review the performance of all subordinates. Level of Control The traditional organizational structure is a pyramid with a chief executive at the top.

The empowered employees of a team structure can act independently in real time, without waiting for permission from the command chain. Decision Making Bureaucracy may hinder creativity and innovation.

In a traditional structure, a clear-cut chain of command flows in an unbroken line from employees all the way up to the top of the organization. Communication In a traditional organization, most communication starts at the top of the organization.

A manager in a traditional organization typically makes decisions without consulting her subordinates. A small business benefits when performance gaps are identified early, and interventions can be implemented.

This decentralization of power gives employees of the team structure much more autonomy than employees working within traditional structures.

On the other hand, team-based organizations are less structured and can adapt quickly to new situations. These informal sub-teams may only exist for a day, week or month. For example, the team may use social media technology, including a wiki, blog or forum, to share information, make announcements and report status updates.

Every part has a specialized purpose, and those parts are coordinated to efficiently output a predictable and consistent result. Making decisions lower on the organizational structure means the company has to disseminate information required for the decisions and the impacts of the decisions themselves throughout the organization.

This organic nature provides flexibility and innovation, while the mechanistic traditional structure allows for standardization and efficient, large-scale production.

This includes identifying individuals who need to participate in discussions and strategies for choosing alternatives. Additionally, people may report to more than one manager in a matrix structure and attend multiple meetings on the same topic.

By moving some of the decision-making down to the working level, the contemporary organizational structure achieves a greater flexibility in meeting external challenges.

In a team-based organization, the communication process is typically less structured and more informal since a traditional organizational structure tends to be rigid and a team-based structure is more flexible.

These traditional structures tend to rely on formal reporting relationships and work poorly if you need to change rapidly.Traditional organizational structure employs a familiar power dynamic: somebody leads, others follow, with extra managers deputized to help run things.

Companies still use this structure of top. comparison between traditional and new organization. Therefore the contemporary structure is used by organizations. Contemporary organizational designs The flexible structural methods that job tasks are divided, grouped, and coordinated for response to dynamic environmental factors.

To face highly dynamic and complex environment the 5/5(14). An Introduction to the Comparison of Traditional and a Modern Family PAGES 1. WORDS View Full Essay. More essays like this: structure of family, modern family, traditional family.

Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin - Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami University. Exactly what I needed. structure of family, modern family, traditional. comparison of the traditional and contemporary extended family units of the hopi and lakota (sioux): a study of the deterioration of kinship structures and functions.

Analytical Comparison of Flat and Vertical Organizational Structures Dr. Rishipal, Professor and Head, AIBAS, Amity University, Gurgaon, Haryana, India This paper has addressed the structure of modern organizations in Paper has also discussed the traditional organizational structures which are being replaced by flat organizational.

Traditional Family vs. Modern Family.

In this traditional structure, the father was usually the breadwinner, meaning he would be the family’s primary source of income. The mother, on the other hand, was usually the caretaker of the household, in that she would mind the children, the cooking, cleaning, and so on.

Comparison of contemporary and traditional structure
Rated 3/5 based on 75 review