Sample Analysis Format Text: Could this methodology have answered their question? If I find the paper especially interesting and even if I am going to recommend rejectionI tend to give a more detailed review because I want to encourage the authors to develop the paper or, maybe, to do a new paper along the lines suggested in the review.
Then I read the Methods section very carefully. Could I replicate the results using the information in the Methods and the description of the analysis? Many journals send the decision letters to the reviewers.
I always comment on the form of the paper, highlighting whether it is well written, has correct grammar, and follows a correct structure. I try to link any criticism I have either to a page number or a quotation from the manuscript to ensure that my argument is understood.
Just start writing, then revise Pre-write, outline, write, revise. I usually write down all the things that I noticed, good and bad, so my decision does not influence the content and length of my review.
When I recommend revisions, I try to give clear, detailed feedback to guide the authors. Analyzing the text is very much like doing literary analysis, which many students have done before.
This often requires doing some background reading, sometimes including some of the cited literature, about the theory presented in the manuscript.
Brainstorm a lot, then start writing. Include your reasons for why you feel this way. Then, throughout, if what I am reading is only partly comprehensible, I do not spend a lot of energy trying to make sense of it, but in my review I will relay the ambiguities to the author.
It will also provide you with an overview of the new advances in the field and help you when writing and submitting your own articles. Conclusions that are overstated or out of sync with the findings will adversely impact my review and recommendations.
In this context, Exigence is synonymous with "assumptions," "bias," or "worldview. Your task is to summarize, not give a personal opinion.
In addition to considering their overall quality, sometimes figures raise questions about the methods used to collect or analyze the data, or they fail to support a finding reported in the paper and warrant further clarification.
So although peer reviewing definitely takes some effort, in the end it will be worth it. Cite this Article A tool to create a citation to reference this article Cite this Article. How does the author interest the audience? It will help you make the right decision.
I make a decision after drafting my review.
Is the research sound? I also carefully look at the explanation of the results and whether the conclusions the authors draw are justified and connected with the broader argument made in the paper.Aug 16, · How to Write a Summary, Analysis, and Response Essay Paper With Examples.
Updated on May 17, Virginia Kearney. more.
Virginia has been a university English instructor for over 20 years. She specializes in helping people write essays faster and easier. How to Write a Summary / Analysis / Response mi-centre.coms: Write a brief summary of the article. A summary is a paragraph telling readers, in your own words, what the article is about.
Share the article’s main ideas. Write it as though you were telling a friend about this article. Remember the 5 Ws and H: who, what, where, when. The point of writing a summary essay is to convey an understanding of the essence of a source text to readers, without them having to read it in its entirety.
Steps for Writing a Summary Essay. Thoroughly read and study the original text. It usually takes me a few hours. Most of the time is spent closely reading the paper and taking notes. Once I have the notes, writing the review itself generally takes less than an hour. - Walsh. It can take me quite a long time to write a good review, sometimes a full day of work and sometimes even longer.
Preparing to Write: To write a good summary it is important to thoroughly understand the material you are working with. Here are some preliminary steps in writing a summary.Download